I just read a very interesting blog post by social media expert John Dvorak, arguing that social media is not a particularly effective marketing tool. Full post is here.
He offers supporting data, but what I find most compelling is his common sense, funny explanation:
“Joe! Hi! How’s the wife? I have a discount coupon for you for the next time you rent from Dollar. Ten percent off, buddy!” … Obviously this is not the way friends interact. So why are they going to suddenly interact online like that?”
Like so many communications folks, I’ve argued to both nonprofits and B2B clients lately that we should be thinking up strategy for social media. But despite all my readings, I continue to be challenged by that nagging ole’ question, “Why?” Dvorak’s eye-opening and entirely common-sense post confirms my trepidation. But also maybe clarifies?
The case I find myself making to nonprofits is that a good social media strategy can present a sound (if not terribly measurable) way to dramatically improve “stakeholder relations.” A social media strategy could be a cheap and fairly free-flow way to keep the nonprofit’s most enthusiastic volunteers and donors in-the-know, engaged and listened to. If and only if those things are done well, those people can ultimately be called upon to do more, and that’s good.
The case I find myself making to B2B companies, at least the kind I’m talking to, is that a good social media strategy can grow awareness and credibility by nature of the company’s honest and active “participation” in its marketplace. That means finding and engaging online, candidly and visibly, with employees, trading partners, and key customers – actually listening to what those folks have to say! – then finding ways to feed that input back into corporate strategy-setting. None of that directly results in sales. But done well, it supports it.
Am I right? I hope so. I think so, even if Dvorak is correct in his assertion that using social media to disseminate rental-car coupons doesn’t really work. If only I were 100% sure.